spurious observation - définition. Qu'est-ce que spurious observation
Diclib.com
Dictionnaire ChatGPT
Entrez un mot ou une phrase dans n'importe quelle langue 👆
Langue:     

Traduction et analyse de mots par intelligence artificielle ChatGPT

Sur cette page, vous pouvez obtenir une analyse détaillée d'un mot ou d'une phrase, réalisée à l'aide de la meilleure technologie d'intelligence artificielle à ce jour:

  • comment le mot est utilisé
  • fréquence d'utilisation
  • il est utilisé plus souvent dans le discours oral ou écrit
  • options de traduction de mots
  • exemples d'utilisation (plusieurs phrases avec traduction)
  • étymologie

Qu'est-ce (qui) est spurious observation - définition

AMOUNT OF CIPHERTEXT NEEDED TO UNAMBIGUOUSLY BREAK AN ENCRYPTION SYSTEM
Spurious key

Spurious relationship         
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP IN WHICH TWO OR MORE EVENTS OR VARIABLES ARE ASSOCIATED BUT NOT CAUSALLY RELATED, DUE TO EITHER COINCIDENCE OR THE PRESENCE OF A CERTAIN THIRD, UNSEEN FACTOR
Joint effect; Nonspuriousness; Non-spuriousness; Third Variable Problem; Fallacy of causation; Spurious correlation; Specious correlation
In statistics, a spurious relationship or spurious correlationBurns, William C., "Spurious Correlations", 1997.
Bonilla observation         
FIRST SIGHTING OF UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
Jose Bonilla Observation; José Bonilla Observation
On August 12, 1883, the astronomer José Bonilla reported that he saw more than 300 dark, unidentified objects crossing before the Sun while observing sunspot activity at Zacatecas Observatory in Mexico. He was able to take several photographs, exposing wet plates at 1/100 second.
Spurious         
WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE
Spurious (disambiguation)
·adj Not legitimate; bastard; as, spurious issue.
II. Spurious ·adj Not proceeding from the true source, or from the source pretended; not genuine; false; adulterate.

Wikipédia

Unicity distance

In cryptography, unicity distance is the length of an original ciphertext needed to break the cipher by reducing the number of possible spurious keys to zero in a brute force attack. That is, after trying every possible key, there should be just one decipherment that makes sense, i.e. expected amount of ciphertext needed to determine the key completely, assuming the underlying message has redundancy.

Claude Shannon defined the unicity distance in his 1949 paper "Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems".

Consider an attack on the ciphertext string "WNAIW" encrypted using a Vigenère cipher with a five letter key. Conceivably, this string could be deciphered into any other string—RIVER and WATER are both possibilities for certain keys. This is a general rule of cryptanalysis: with no additional information it is impossible to decode this message.

Of course, even in this case, only a certain number of five letter keys will result in English words. Trying all possible keys we will not only get RIVER and WATER, but SXOOS and KHDOP as well. The number of "working" keys will likely be very much smaller than the set of all possible keys. The problem is knowing which of these "working" keys is the right one; the rest are spurious.